Search Results for: Jamie Dimon

By Pam Martens: July 6, 2012  A five day chart of JPMorgan Chase shows what shareholders think of the company. (The market was closed Wednesday for the July 4th holiday.) Taxpayers have no reason to cheer either.  Each day seems to bring another tax-payer funded investigation of potentially serious wrongdoing at the firm.  The latest probe involves an investigation into JPMorgan for manipulating electric markets in California and the Midwest through its commodities business.  The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued subpoenas to JPMorgan in April and May.  FERC wanted emails pertaining to its investigation.  JPMorgan is now being sued by FERC in Federal Court in Washington, D.C. to turn over 25 emails it has withheld.   The dispute has erupted into the public spotlight over the incredulous claim by JPMorgan that the emails are subject to attorney-client privilege.  FERC says the emails are between bankers.  How JPMorgan hopes to convince a Federal court … Continue reading →

By Pam Martens: June 29, 2012 Recent settlements by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have sent a dangerous message to Wall Street: feel free to lie freely to investors and shareholders as long as you have deep pockets.  In 2007, Citigroup told investors it had $13 billion in subprime exposures, knowing the figure was in excess of $50 billion.  It got caught and on July 29, 2010 paid $75 million to settle charges with the SEC.  Its CFO, Gary Crittenden, was fined a puny $100,000 and the head of its Investor Relations Department, Arthur Tildesley, was fined an even punier $80,000.  That sent a clear message to Wall Street, lying about the risks you are taking or what’s on your balance sheet results in a slap on the wrist and some chump change.  Lying has now morphed into its own profit center.  Also in July 2010, Goldman Sachs settled … Continue reading →

  By Pam Martens: June 22, 2012  Moody’s had barely published its ratings downgrades of the big banks on Wall Street before their public relations flaks hurled an avalanche of insults at Moody’s.  Citigroup was the most vitriolic of the pack, calling Moody’s “arbitrary,” “backward looking,” and “opaque.”  This from a company managed by a former hedge fund manager whose stock would be trading at $2.79 (intraday) had it not done a 1 for 10 reverse split and who previously hid tens of billions off its balance sheet in Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs).  In fact, Citigroup wouldn’t even exist today had the taxpayer not bailed it out with $45 billion in TARP funds, over $300 billion in guarantees, and trillions in secret loans from the Fed. But Citi said in its press release: “In our view, investors and clients should make their own decisions and not rely on ratings — … Continue reading →

By Pam Martens: June 22, 2012  On June 25 and June 26, 1998, the Federal Reserve held hearings at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on allowing Travelers Group, which owned an insurance firm (Travelers), investment bank (Salomon Brothers) and brokerage firm (Smith Barney) to merge with a bank holding FDIC insured deposits (Citicorp/Citibank). Despite solid testimony that this merger was illegal, the Fed approved the merger and Citigroup was born. Sandy Weill, head of Travelers, and Jamie Dimon, his first lieutenant (now Chairman and CEO of the risk-management-challenged JPMorgan Chase) were the brains behind the Travelers/Citicorp deal and made a fortune from it.  That merger forced all of Citigroup’s main competitors to do similar deals in order to compete, setting in motion today’s too big to fail financial chaos. Why didn’t the Fed listen to the testimony?  Why didn’t the Fed follow the law? Here’s a sampling of … Continue reading →

By Pam Martens: June 20, 2012 The House of Representatives held a hearing at 9:00 a.m. this morning titled “Market Structure: Ensuring Orderly, Efficient, Innovative and Competitive Markets for Issuers and Investors.” The hearing was convened by the Capital Markets and Government Sponsored Enterprises Subcommittee of the House Financial Services Committee.  The panel included no one representing the public’s voice. Four of the panelists called attention to the loss of confidence that the public now has in the stock market.  Those views are in stark contrast to the perpetually repeated statement by Jamie Dimon, Chairman and CEO of JPMorgan Chase, that “We have the widest, deepest and best capital markets in the world.”  There are now 264,000 links at Google’s search engine to some variation of that statement by Jamie Dimon, e.g., “the best capital markets,” “the widest, deepest and most transparent capital markets.”  The gap between Dimon’s statement and … Continue reading →

By Pam Martens: June 19, 2012 The House Financial Services Committee was in hearing session for four hours today on JPMorgan Chase’s losses and the only thing that was materially different from last week’s Senate Banking hearing was the tie of Jamie Dimon, Chairman and CEO of JPMorgan Chase. America’s mega banks that are too big to fail are now viewed as too big to manage,  too big to regulate and the latest incarnation, too big to tell the truth to the American people for fear of a panic.  Repeatedly during the hearing today, Chairman Spencer Bachus, Republican from Alabama, interrupted fellow members of the Committee who attempted to probe the size or specifics of the losses. The impression was that a deal had been made with JPMorgan’s lawyers that these subjects would be quickly shot down by the Chair. The House Financial Services committee also heard from the siloed regulators … Continue reading →

By Pam Martens: June 18, 2012 Mary Schapiro, Chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission, has released her written statement for tomorrow’s hearing before the House Financial Services Committee regarding JPMorgan Chase’s losses. Based on the text, a number of problematic areas may arise for Chairman and CEO, Jamie Dimon, who signed off on the firm’s first quarter financial filings with the SEC: Was there adequate disclosure of the credit default insurance sold to hedge funds and the ensuing income the firm was receiving from this high risk source; Was the potential for losses on all synthetic credit products adequately described; Did the firm properly detail the collateral calls that could arise on these synthetic credit derivatives. Why wasn’t the change to the VAR (Value at Risk) disclosed to investors? Read the full text of the statement here.

By Pam Martens: June 18, 2012 You didn’t really think the ubiquitous U.S. Chamber of Commerce would stay quiet for long regarding the JPMorgan Chase fracas on Capital Hill did you? They’ve got a post up today at their blog comparing JPMorgan’s Chief Investment Office to getting hit by a bus.  While that’s exactly what it has felt like to shareholders who have lost a quarter of their investment in the stock since Bloomberg News first started reporting on the problem on April 5, the Chamber actually attempts to twist the bus analogy into an argument for giving JPMorgan a free hand to blow up depositors’ money as it sees fit. One suspects that someone connected to JPMorgan has asked the Chamber to trumpet a warning to frisky Congressmen on the House Financial Services Committee who will be probing Jamie Dimon, Chairman and CEO of JPMorgan Chase, tomorrow.  After the … Continue reading →